Image source: http://www.ucfunding.com/wp-content/uploads/case-study-strategic-protection-group.png
But let little doubts and carefully revered transcripts of his speeches. Well, at least now these "tectonic" revelation, he made a gift to women on March 8. For the convenience of readers we have the perception of their smallness podredaktiruem being tainted by the author's tongue-tied verbosity, and take in quotes, comments and leave without them. Begins to broadcast it to the landmark:
"That's what recovery? This is when the waves are. One after another. You threw them a piece, and he can then swim up lemon (one million). Economic growth comes from these waves. " Or a piece of sail by shit. "For some unknown source comes growth. But it does not matter. That's the secret to the unpredictability. You realize something? I - no. But, most likely because he studied in a different school, not in the highest. Either a member university, we are primitive explain that economic growth when it increases the production of goods and services, respectively, and welfare of the people. But if you go waves, shaking the economy: the rise, then fall ... It's who train on this right?
"That's all monetarists revile, requiring not produce extra money in circulation. I, Yasin, monetarist, such as Kudrin contrary. The peculiarity of our economy - and our principle - not to release the money, because our business is suppressed. But in principle you can even print it. That China began with the fact that they just print money. Adding money, you are like fertilizes the economy. And how many of these were cases - complete. Incidentally, China had no reserves. Purely split consciousness! In China at the beginning of market reforms is not something that was put down, it never was. But podnapechatali denezhek, fertilized, so to speak, the economy, and off they'd go - now China a world power, the second after the United States. Even in a crisis where economic growth 5%, and we - the decline in industry by 18%. But Yasin obtained: bad for the economy of Russia "coin money" because it violates the monetarist principle. But for China and other (such cases - is full ") - good.
Why encourage the compression and containment of monetary growth, that without any connection with the practice recommended monetarists, for the economy bad? Because the crisis started because of lack of money in the economy and it determines the degree of their lack of depth of the crisis. From the third law of bubbles (J. "Finance and credit, 22, 2009., Http://crisis-blog.ru/world/krizis-i-zakony-finansovyx-piramid.html), it follows that for to neutralize the consequences of the crisis and to suppress the development of negative phenomena in the economy have to do exactly the opposite - an urgent disbanding zero Stabilization Fund to provide loans directly to companies (but not the oligarchic structures). This measure is comparable to running the water pump - get it to work, you must first in his shirt, pour a bucket of water (money), so then he started to pump water with controlled pressure. So did Abama, and other leaders of developed countries, "pouring" unprecedentedly large sums of money into the financial system, while lowering the refinancing rate. Well, in Russia, where the power reigns monetarists, money given to banks elected, rather than businesses, refinancing dramatically kicked up. Banks traded budget money for the currency, partially brought abroad, strengthening the flight of capital, partly directed at solving their own problems. They have a stand, but to the companies money and not come down. That is why the result that the country has to implement the recommendations "to the contrary, monetarists Kudrin, was fully expected.
It is understandable that in times of crisis funds should be directed primarily to those industries that operate in the domestic market and, above all in agriculture and food production and light industry. We have very favorable time for recovery industries machine tools, instrumentation, domestic pharmaceutical and other industries have lost at Boris Yeltsin. What distinguished broadcasting Evgeni? It is broadcast to us about the benefits of high prices of pharmaceuticals.
"The establishment of rules that would prohibit private pharmacies to sell drugs above a certain price, ie regulation of prices, will lead to the disappearance of the sale of those drugs, which are installed prices. Neither rich nor poor can not in this case to obtain an effective remedy, which is produced abroad. All the technological progress in the economy, including in the manufacture of drugs is because there is a possibility at some point to make new drugs to obtain the monopolistic profit. But the more the producers and sellers in the market, the monopoly of a decreasing, as a result of drugs from this cheaper. Open market mechanism. If you pull off this stimulus, then no one will be doing it. "
But could Yassin? Right, even as a human! If someone invented something new, made of high quality, it has the right to charge any price and get a monopoly profit. Then it begin to produce other goods, the market is saturated and prices fall - "the market mechanism is working"!
And at the same time, he was wrong. It is not right! But why? Because the most poorly educated economist knows that capitalism in its development passes through three stages: primitive accumulation, capitalism itself, described in detail by Marx and the financial and monopoly capitalism. But Yasin - scientific (!) Head (!) Higher (!) School of Economics! This is not a breadth-shavyr. I do not know? But ... from the song, that is verbatim, the words can not throw. We recommend this as if we were yesterday, fell asleep in developed socialism, and now, happily slept through the first stage, woke up in the development of capitalism. But this does not happen. Yasin described the mechanism of market regulation of prices refers to a stable market, where the same act tough antitrust measures. And with Russia is it applicable?
Russia is capitalism novokap stage of primitive accumulation, with the most barbaric and ruthless accumulation, coupled with underdeveloped financial and monopoly. Thieves nouveaux riches are not each other (and each other - too) in the process of competition, and all the people by increasing prices and inflation - that's where all their billions. In Russia the whole, I repeat - the whole market rests on the fact that once snatch high price, and there could not care less! I live in an area where within a 2-3-minute walk there are 5 (five!) Pharmacies. Nortel - do not want. Oh, and do not want. Raise prices in one - immediately rising in all others. What? If you're sick, buy at any price. And the thesis that Yassin, that the high price of drugs can increase their production and move innovation in pharmaceuticals - nonsense! In Penza is a plant "biosynthesis", which is to market reforms provided half of the country with antibiotics, and worked on it about 6 thousand people. We produce nothing, only fasuet. And the staff was reduced by 10 times. Why, Yasin you clear our sun, pharmacists have been slow to restore the production of antibiotics? As, however, and other vital medicines? And if tomorrow the war? Yes, spit, not monopoly case ...
And the doctor's final chord: "Today the most expensive health care is in the United States. Slightly or 80% of all health expenditures are elderly and so on. But 80% of all innovation in medicine, too, is made in the USA. That such a dialectic. Yes, this is precisely the dialectic. But - split consciousness. You know, there is a certain category of people who think that the real world is a reflection of consciousness. He opened his eyes - that he, a world reality. Close - no it was gone. And that the efforts of consciousness, the mind (or lack thereof) can change the world without making a physical effort. And if he does not change, this rotten world, so much the worse for it. That's better that our old men and 80% of pensions would spend on drugs and doctors, then in Russia will "Innovations in Medicine".
That would be more in the talking head met the 100% the size of spending on the continued growth of tariffs in public utilities, and food ... "There is a firm rule, monetary - no salary, no pension, no other regular income can not be indexed. Do not do automatic indexing, because thus includes the process of generating more inflation. We add pensions - begins a wave of other wage increases as cleaners, nurses, even to someone. And this whole wave went. In the end, it turns out, inflation has risen by 15%, and the expected 6%. But the pension must increase no matter what. And wages in the budgetary field. " Again, split consciousness: automatic indexing in any case can not be done, but the pensions and salaries to state employees need to improve no matter what.
To the perplexed question of leadership: not whether it would be to break up inflation, immediately followed by the answer: "I know the way out! This is less profitable for retirees, but inflation would not grow. Make compensation because the compensation comes at a fraction. Relatively less pay, and best of all ... reduce the crisis - that is what creates the preconditions for reducing inflation! "In short, come - only the crisis, and we did not have to be completely happy, and here he is out! Singing it ossanu ... "There is reduced demand, prices fall. Yeah, run away! In Russia, falling demand was offset by higher prices and ..., respectively, inflation amounted to 8,8%.
You have to understand that our monetary authorities are still sacred (or blindly) thought upon the monetarist precepts, were forced to go to the indexation of pensions. And I would have gladly not have them to raise, valorizirovat and index. Weak health pensioners should be relatively well fed and clothed, to have the strength to reach the ballot box and express its gratitude to those in power. Otherwise, who's going then "our" will elect? No one noticed that the increase is always combined with the electoral process? Past regional elections showed that the ER again "the people", though its leader in this most people chop off in the midst of the crisis 25% increase in tariffs, so that, God forbid, oligarhata have not lost my appetite. And you, Eugene G., and this offer Cenci zaminusovat. By the way, I am writing to you and the other reformers too greyhounds that if the pension increase once or twice a year, and this is done by the pension funds, the provision of compensation, at least for the ruble, requires monthly efforts of officials to issue certificates, verification, etc. d.. And consequently, it is the basis for growth in the number of inspection-payable claims, verification, etc. And can you suggest another card to enter ... on compensation? From you will become ...
Nicholas 1st in order to garner fame merciful monarch, after the suppression of the Decembrist uprising instructed to draw up a list of rebels liberal Speransky. He knew that the zeal and the cruelty of the liberals always exceeds reasonable limits - Sperdnski compiled a list of the king cut 10 times and sentenced to death only five. Our young reformers, Yegor Gaidar, Chubais, and others of their imitators, greedily for power, also did not spare the people, country and plunged it into the abyss of ruin and degeneration in the raw materials appendage of the West. They have not been such a king to send these liberastov far away, for example, in Iran, as Griboyedov.
But there are "scientists" who are talking about all there's tectonic changes in the economy. However, as shown by the analysis, the shift, if it takes place in the economy, the interpretation of the author is clearly visible Clinic. In short - you want a doctor, a therapist may, if the patient is able to think critically about reality. But most likely require another doctor profile. I am not a doctor, but from the popular literature know that if there is a person split consciousness (see the above), the perception of the negative as positive (results of the reforms), the violation of social cognition (pricing in Pharmacy), paranoid symptoms (obsession with the sanctity of the market) , disorganization of thought and speech, their unusual (listen to "Echo" and read the transcript), etc., there is the mental shift. The only trouble is that if somatic diseases amenable to treatment, the mental health ... is not heard. I only know that treatment is largely in isolation from the society who suffer disabilities. But does this A. Venediktov and that except Yassin is sensible economists?
